Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio (2024)

Asset Allocation

PositionCategory/SectorWeight

BND

Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
Total Bond Market

20%

VEA

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
Foreign Large Cap Equities

30%

VTI

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Large Cap Growth Equities

50%

Benchmark

Quarterly

Rebalance portfolio

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Quarterly

Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio

Benchmark (^GSPC)

Portfolio components

The earliest data available for this chart is Jul 26, 2007, corresponding to the inception date of VEA

Returns By Period

As of May 25, 2024, the Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio returned 7.01% Year-To-Date and 7.98% of annualized return in the last 10 years.

Year-To-Date1 month6 months1 year5 years (annualized)10 years (annualized)

^GSPC

11.21%4.60%16.35%27.79%13.43%10.76%
Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio7.01%3.44%12.94%18.71%9.92%7.95%
Portfolio components:

VTI

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
10.78%4.01%17.10%27.61%14.65%12.14%

BND

Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
-1.41%1.64%3.36%2.49%-0.06%1.21%

VEA

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
6.44%3.70%12.51%15.48%7.94%4.82%

Monthly Returns

The table below presents the monthly returns of Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio, with color gradation from worst to best to easily spot seasonal factors. Returns are adjusted for dividends.

JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20240.20%3.21%2.92%-3.68%7.01%
20236.83%-2.78%2.68%1.44%-1.14%4.68%2.75%-2.29%-4.04%-2.64%8.25%5.04%19.40%
2022-4.60%-2.26%1.23%-7.39%0.55%-7.16%6.73%-4.17%-8.41%5.63%7.12%-3.75%-16.74%
2021-0.55%1.99%2.43%3.61%1.32%1.14%1.26%1.79%-3.46%4.31%-2.09%3.11%15.60%
2020-0.54%-5.92%-11.50%9.21%4.56%2.34%3.96%4.98%-2.41%-2.15%10.39%4.10%15.91%
20196.74%2.50%1.26%2.81%-4.48%5.51%0.13%-1.06%1.69%2.08%2.30%2.48%23.76%
20183.79%-3.65%-0.97%0.44%1.07%-0.13%2.34%1.34%0.20%-6.45%1.28%-5.82%-6.91%
20172.07%2.28%0.95%1.35%1.68%0.67%1.89%0.25%1.88%1.61%1.76%1.19%19.05%
2016-4.27%-0.73%5.77%1.10%0.77%-0.07%3.36%0.17%0.61%-2.01%1.28%1.81%7.72%
2015-0.67%4.41%-0.84%1.40%0.53%-1.94%1.47%-5.27%-2.45%6.00%0.00%-1.75%0.38%
2014-2.84%4.27%0.12%0.66%1.79%1.64%-1.76%2.38%-2.39%1.41%1.42%-1.10%5.48%
20133.74%0.41%2.40%2.57%-0.08%-1.88%4.50%-2.18%4.57%3.26%1.51%1.83%22.37%

Expense Ratio

Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio has an expense ratio of 0.04% which is considered to be low. Below you can find the expense ratios of portfolio funds side-by-side and effortlessly compare their relative costs.

VTI

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF

BND

Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

The current rank of Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio is 46, suggesting that the investment has average results relative to other portfolios in terms of risk-adjusted performance. This ranking is determined by the cumulative values of the indicators listed below.

Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio

Sharpe Ratio Rank

Sortino Ratio Rank

Omega Ratio Rank

Calmar Ratio Rank

Martin Ratio Rank

The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance Indicators

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for positions. Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio

Sharpe ratio

Sortino ratio

Calmar ratio

Martin ratio

^GSPC

Sharpe ratio

Sortino ratio

Omega ratio

Calmar ratio

Martin ratio

Portfolio components

Sharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio

VTI

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
2.553.571.442.159.47

BND

Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
0.340.531.060.120.96

VEA

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
1.291.891.230.983.93

Sharpe Ratio

The current Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio Sharpe ratio is 2.03. This value is calculated based on the past 1 year of trading data and takes into account price changes and dividends.

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.76 to 2.68, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio lies between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that the its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios. This suggests a balanced approach to risk and return, which might be suitable for a broad range of investors.

Use the chart below to compare the Sharpe ratio of Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio with the selected benchmark, providing insights into the investment's historical performance in terms of risk-adjusted returns. Go to the Sharpe ratio tool for more fine-grained control over the calculation options.

Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio

Benchmark (^GSPC)

Portfolio components

Dividends

Dividend yield

Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio granted a 2.32% dividend yield in the last twelve months.

TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio2.32%2.28%2.23%1.95%1.77%2.34%2.59%2.19%2.38%2.38%2.54%2.21%
Portfolio components:

VTI

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.35%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%1.76%1.74%

BND

Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.36%3.09%2.60%1.97%2.22%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%2.79%2.78%

VEA

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
3.23%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%3.68%2.60%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way.

Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio

Benchmark (^GSPC)

Portfolio components

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio was 47.74%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 539 trading sessions.

The current Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio drawdown is 0.57%.

Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-47.74%Nov 1, 2007339Mar 9, 2009539Apr 27, 2011878
-28.12%Feb 13, 202027Mar 23, 202095Aug 6, 2020122
-24.47%Nov 9, 2021235Oct 14, 2022329Feb 7, 2024564
-17.25%May 2, 2011108Oct 3, 2011111Mar 13, 2012219
-15.25%Jan 29, 2018229Dec 24, 201881Apr 23, 2019310

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The current Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio volatility is 2.75%, representing the average percentage change in the investments's value, either up or down over the past month. The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.

Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio

Benchmark (^GSPC)

Portfolio components

Diversification

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BNDVEAVTI
BND1.00-0.12-0.18
VEA-0.121.000.84
VTI-0.180.841.00

The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Jul 27, 2007

Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio (2024)

FAQs

Is the 3 fund portfolio good enough? ›

While the three-fund portfolio is great because it's simple to learn and easy to manage, it isn't without its disadvantages, as we discuss on our personal finance primer.

What is the performance of the Bogleheads 3 fund portfolio? ›

As of May 31, 2024, the Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio returned 5.97% Year-To-Date and 7.83% of annualized return in the last 10 years.

What is the Lazy 3 fund portfolio? ›

Three-fund lazy portfolios

These usually consist of three equal parts of bonds (total bond market or TIPS), total US market and total international market.

How often should I rebalance my 3 fund portfolio? ›

Rebalancing is about managing risk, not chasing investment returns. Rebalancing your portfolio once a year is plenty. Rebalancing less frequently may be even better if your portfolio is diversified from the outset.

What is a lazy portfolio? ›

A Lazy Portfolio is a collection of investments that requires very little maintenance. It's the typical passive investing strategy, for long-term investors, with time horizons of more than 10 years. Choose your investment style (Classic or Alternative?), pick your Lazy Portfolios and implement them with ETFs.

Is VTI better than VTSAx? ›

VTI vs VTSAX: Key Takeaways

As you'll see in the table above, VTI and VTSAX are nearly identical in every way. The only difference is that VTI's expense ratio is slightly lower at 0.03% compared with 0.04% for VTSAX. This is in alignment with other Vanguard comparisons, such as VOO versus VFIAX.

What is the 4 rule in Bogleheads? ›

The basic rule is that you sell 4% of your portfolio the first year. This gives you a certain $ amount to cover your living expenses for that year. In subsequent years, you sell just enough to get the same $ amount as the first year, but adjusted for inflation so that you keep the same purchasing power.

What is the 50 30 20 rule for Bogleheads? ›

First, Warren's original rule was 30 to wants and 20 to savings, but if you can flip that, great! Apply the numbers to your after tax income. Then figure out how much you need for housing, utilities, transportation, food, insurance and clothing. If that is 50% or less, everything else is wants.

What is the Bogle recommended portfolio? ›

Building a Solid Foundation: The Boring Money Account

The core of Bogles recommended portfolio is having a boring money account invested primarily in index funds. Bogle suggested putting at least 95% of investable assets into low-cost, diversified index funds.

What is Dave Ramsey portfolio? ›

Ramsey recommends dividing your investment portfolio into four categories: 1. Growth and Income Funds (25%): Large-cap funds that invest in well-established companies with a history of paying dividends. 2. Growth Funds (25%): Mid-cap and large-cap funds focused on companies with strong growth potential.

What is Bogleheads 3 bucket strategy? ›

Stripped to its simplest form, here's the premise of the Bucket Strategy™: You organize your investments into three main groupings, or "buckets" and take the majority of the risk in Bucket No. 3, largely with stocks and real estate.

What is the Golden Butterfly portfolio? ›

The golden butterfly portfolio involves dividing your investments equally into five market segments. Here's how to split up your investments according to Portfolio Charts (the version Stephan shared had some slight differences, but this is the original): 20% U.S. total stock market. 20% small cap value stocks.

What are the cons of a 3 fund portfolio? ›

Cons
  • Less fine-tuned control over your investments.
  • Poor performance from one of your funds can have an outsized impact.
  • Potentially less diversification, depending on the funds you choose.
Feb 1, 2024

What is the 85 15 investment strategy? ›

The rule calls for purchasing a spending guarantee with 85% of wealth and investing the remaining 15% in equities with 3x leverage. Surprisingly, this leverage is a tool for managing risk.

What is the 5/25 rule for rebalancing? ›

It states that rebalancing between assets should occur only if an asset or category has drifted from its original target by an absolute percentage of 5% or a relative of 25% whichever is less.

How many funds make an ideal portfolio? ›

While there is no precise answer for the number of funds one should hold in a portfolio, 8 funds (+/-2) across asset classes may be considered optimal depending on the financial objectives and goals of the investor. Further, higher allocation of portfolio to the right fund is of crucial importance.

Is 3% a good investment return? ›

General ROI: A positive ROI is generally considered good, with a normal ROI of 5-7% often seen as a reasonable expectation. However, a strong general ROI is something greater than 10%. Return on Stocks: On average, a ROI of 7% after inflation is often considered good, based on the historical returns of the market.

Is 3 ETFs enough? ›

Generally speaking, fewer than 10 ETFs are likely enough to diversify your portfolio, but this will vary depending on your financial goals, ranging from retirement savings to income generation.

How many funds should be in a retirement portfolio? ›

A commonly cited rule of thumb is to own between 10 and 20 mutual funds, but the actual number will vary depending on your individual circ*mstances. Too many funds can lead to unnecessary over-diversification and overlap. There's really no point in owning, say, two index funds that invest in the same index.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: The Hon. Margery Christiansen

Last Updated:

Views: 6176

Rating: 5 / 5 (50 voted)

Reviews: 81% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: The Hon. Margery Christiansen

Birthday: 2000-07-07

Address: 5050 Breitenberg Knoll, New Robert, MI 45409

Phone: +2556892639372

Job: Investor Mining Engineer

Hobby: Sketching, Cosplaying, Glassblowing, Genealogy, Crocheting, Archery, Skateboarding

Introduction: My name is The Hon. Margery Christiansen, I am a bright, adorable, precious, inexpensive, gorgeous, comfortable, happy person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.